In 1991, Supreme Court Judge Warren
Burger called the American gun lobby’s interpretation of the US Constitution’s Second Amendment – the right
to have and bear arms – “one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word
fraud, on the American people by any special interest group that I have ever
seen in my lifetime.”
Burger – and others – pointed out that
the rights it conferred made sense in the context
of the then necessary existence of state militias to keep the peace.
The fraud has been the gun lobby’s successful reworking of a pragmatic, late 18th-century decision into a general
and pretty-much unfettered right for any US citizen who isn’t chained up in a
padded cell to carry just about any lethal weapon as a piece of arm candy in
the early 21st.
I think that is a just criticism of
the NRA’s stance.
It also raises something else:
It’s worth recalling that, while the
founding of the USA at the end of the 18th century was a
revolutionary novelty – a New World indeed – it’s in fact the oldest and in
many ways the most antiquated of all constitutional states apart, I believe,
from San Marino.
I wonder whether the reverence which US
citizens give to their Constitution may actually hinder America’s
development, whereas many older European nations, bloodied from wars and
ideological strife, have had to re-imagine and even reconstitute themselves
from time to time, which has encouraged a necessary pragmatism.
Perhaps this may lie behind some of
the US’s present dysfunctions?
In short, has the USA become too old
for its own good?
No comments:
Post a Comment